More “cripping up” – The Upside

It seems little has changed since I first wrote about cripping up in 2017. Hollywood still makes movies about, but not with, disabled people, and non-disabled actors are still cast in disabled roles as a fast-track to winning an Oscar.

Bryan Cranston, in a wheelchair, is pushed by Kevin Hart. They are both laughing.

This time round, the movie is The Upside, the US remake of French film Les Intouchables. Bryan Cranston plays a character who uses a wheelchair after a paragliding accident paralyses him from the neck down. The wealthy author hires a parolee as a nurse/support worker. A buddy comedy, apparently, ensues. Cranston, who has received criticism for being yet another non-disabled actor in a disabled role, defended his casting by referring to it as a “business decision.”

As I wrote on Instagram, this isn’t so much about this particular casting choice as it is about a repeated pattern of casting non-disabled people over and above disabled actors, again and again and again. Disabled actors have difficulty getting work in *any* role – they’re certainly not in the habit of being cast as any ordinary character who happens to have a disability! So when a non-disabled actor is cast in a disabled role, it seems like the only “acceptable” role for disabled actors is another privilege reserved for non-disabled folks.

As Tales from The Crip wrote,

“Visibly disabled actors are not considered “appropriate” for casting in roles where there’s no mention of disability. The truth is that, had he been a visibly disabled actor, casting statistics show how unlikely it is that Cranston would have been cast in the many, many roles that, together, have built his career and now provide his clout.

If the industry is going to limit nearly all physically disabled actors to roles defined by physical disability, non disabled actors shouldn’t be surprised when there’s anger at seeing those roles lost to actors who are not physically disabled. Starvation seldom breeds generosity.

This is why losing one more exceedingly rare lead role — a wheelchair-using character — is so infuriating. Using the tired “Because BUSINESS” is a sloppy excuse for systemic bias that produces abysmal hiring rates.”

 

Further, when non-disabled folks are cast in prominent disabled roles, it often feels like Oscar-bait (think Dustin Hoffman in Rainman, Eddie Redmayne in The Theory of Everything, etc etc). Actor Adam Pearson recently tweeted that in the 90 years of Oscars, 16% of awards have been for a portrayal of disability, with over 20 non-disabled actors winning awards. In the same period, only two disabled actors have won awards, the last in 1987.

Like so much about appropriation, the portrayal of a particular marginalised group becomes objectionable when a person of privilege benefits from what the marginalised group they mimic would be punished for. If disability is just a costume non-disabled folks can throw on (and cast off) when they feel like it, what does that mean for disabled folks whose disability is an identity? For people who can’t just put aside their wheelchair at the end of a working day, or when faced with stairs instead of ramps?*

An image of actor Eddie Redmayne accepting an Oscar.
Fucking Redmayne.

 

And this isn’t even to mention the other issues with The Upside: the racial implications of a buddy comedy in which a wealthy white man hires a parolee black carer to help him “loosen up”, or Hart’s history of homophobic comments. As Refinery29 pointed out, a remake should “get at some kind of essential truth overlooked by its predecessor … At the very least, it should be adapted to more closely fit the socio-political context of the country it’s being released in.” The Upside could have redeemed the sins of its predecessor with more thoughtful casting or a racially sensitive script. It failed on both counts.

 

A still from film The Upside. Bryan Cranston, expressionless in a wheelchair, navigates a footpath with ambulating costar Kevin Hart.
Cancelled, Cranston.

 

If you want to know more about my feelings about media representation of disability and cripping up, feel free to click through to my previous piece: More “Othering”, Media Representation and Cripping Up.

 

 

*I’m not suggesting being in wheelchair is a bad thing here, or a disabling factor as such. Just that society does not accomodate folks who use them.

Author: Siobhan S

20 something, living in country Australia. Spoonie profile: ME/CFS, dysautonomia, anxiety. All about sewing, knitting and food. Unapologetic feminist and disability advocate.

4 thoughts on “More “cripping up” – The Upside”

  1. Really good article. I went to see The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime last night and while I thought the portrayal of the main character was very good, I did feel a little bit uncomfortable seeing a neurotypical person pretending to be autistic. On the other hand, there is so little representation of neurodivergence that I wonder if anything is better than nothing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s an interesting point. l haven’t read much criticism, positive or negative, about The Curious Incident from the Autism community. I would be interested to know what the general consensus from that community is.

      Liked by 1 person

Thanks for dropping by! I read and value each and every comment you leave. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.